Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Discussion 6_1642584...
Courts can refuse to enforce a contract if they find that it is unconscionable. An unconscionable contract is a contract that is so unfair to one party that a court believes it should not be enforceab...

Discussion 6
Discussion 6

Courts can refuse to enforce a contract if they fi

Week 5- Discussion_D...
To be honest, I do not think that gender has a significant concern in the United States when we are talking about the resilience or disaster risk reduction because I believe that every person should b...

week 5 Discussion- public safety
week 5 Discussion- public safety

To be honest, I do not think that gender has a sig

Week 7 Discussion_16...
I use the computer at work and daily at home.I can't seem to do anything without the use of my computer. Even the cell phones are computers that you carry around and google all day long. It's importan...

Week 7 Discussion
Week 7 Discussion

I use the computer at work and daily at home.I can

Module 5-Discussion

Module 5-Discussion

Q Most of us have goals and dreams. You probably have a vision of what the good life would look like for you. With this in mind, do you think pluralism would help you to live in a diverse society, one in which other people's opinions and lifestyles may clash with your pursuit of the good life? Does relativism offer a better or worse alternative? Explain your reasoning.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
Pluralism would empower the presence of various convictions, philosophies, and societies. This would be useful to live in a different society since there would be such a significant number of common blends and mixes of individuals and foundations. Then again, individuals' assessments and livestyles could conflict since there would be such huge numbers of around. Relativism is an increasingly moderate methodology, since there aren't absolutes and this might be a superior option than having steady clash. Seen right now, bolsters harmony in pluralist social orders by enlightening clash as opposed to stifling it (Hing, 1993).